If you don't have a login/password, ask your administrator (Joep)
For security reasons, these pages can only be accessed from computers at the FEE.
Future seminars
2025-11-13Luca Henkel(Erasmus University Rotterdam) The Role of Interpersonal Uncertainty in Prosocial Behavior. Room: E5.07, 12:00 - 13:00. In prosocial decisions, decision-makers face interpersonal uncertainty–uncertainty about how their choices impact others’ utility. We show theoretically and demonstrate empirically how interpersonal uncertainty shapes behavior across key paradigms in the social preference literature. We hypothesize a two-part mechanism: individuals are averse to interpersonal uncertainty, and they experience different interpersonal uncertainty for different people. We use three approaches to show how this mechanism influences prosocial behavior. First, we compare standard allocation decisions, such as dictator games, with decisions where we remove social consequences but retain uncertainty, revealing strikingly similar patterns. Second, we experimentally vary interpersonal uncertainty to disentangle and quantify its contribution relative to social preferences in prosocial decisions, which we estimate to be of similar importance. Finally, we show that self-reported interpersonal uncertainty systematically predicts behavior across individuals, allocation patterns, and interventions that increase charitable giving.
2025-11-20Nina Xue(Vienna University of Economics and Business) Closing the Gender Leadership Gap: Competitive versus Cooperative Institutions. Room: A2.10, 12:30 - 14:30 (Double seminar). Motivated by the stereotype that women are more cooperative and less competitive, we investigate how the institutional environment impacts the gender leadership gap. An experiment tests leaders’ impact on earnings under competitive (winner take all) versus cooperative (equal earnings distribution) incentive schemes. All leaders enhance efficiency similarly, but a gender gap emerges in the competitive context where women receive lower evaluations for identical advice. This bias disappears in the cooperative context where female leaders are evaluated 50% higher, suggesting that congruence between the environment and gender stereotypes has important policy implications. Men are more willing to lead, regardless of context.
2025-11-20Uri Gneezy (University of California San Diego) Why Don’t People Lie More? Truth Is (Wrongly) Believed to Be More Persuasive. Room: A2.10, 12:30-14:30 (Double seminar). Is truth believed to be more persuasive than falsehood? This paper explores this question using a series of experiments. First, a survey experiment reveals that participants consistently believe the persuasive power of truthful messages is higher than that of lies. Second, two laboratory experiments, in which senders record truthful and false video messages about news events, show that senders mistakenly believe their truthful messages will be more believable. Even when incentivized to lie, most senders choose to tell the truth-if tasked with persuading receivers. If not, however, most senders follow the incentives and lie.